Stats highlights from the first T20 international between India and New Zealand in Nagpur

2898 Number of balls Abhishek Sharma took to complete 5000 runs in T20 cricket – the quickest to the milestone ahead of Andre Russell, who got to 5000 in 2942 balls. No other batter has got there with a strike rate of 160 or more.

7 Number of T20I fifties in less than 25 balls for Abhishek, the most sub-25-ball half-centuries for a batter in men’s T20Is along with Saudi Arabia’s Faisal Khan. Evin Lewis, Rohit, Phil Salt and Suryakumar Yadav have six each.

5911 Number of balls Suryakumar Yadav took to complete 9000 runs in T20 cricket – the second quickest to the milestone behind Russell (5321). Glenn Maxwell (5915) is third.

22 Number of balls Abhishek took for his fifty in Nagpur, the fastest for India against New Zealand in men’s T20Is. The previous quickest was off 23 balls by KL Rahul and Rohit Sharma during the 2020 tour of New Zealand.

238 for 7 India’s total in Nagpur is their highest against New Zealand in men’s T20Is. Their previous highest was 234 for 4 in Ahmedabad in 2023. It is also the third-highest total against New Zealand in men’s T20Is.

287.83 Rinku Singh‘s batting strike rate in the 19th and 20th overs in T20Is – 213 runs off 74 balls, with 22 sixes and 14 fours. It is the best strike rate among all batters with 100-plus runs from available ball-by-ball data.

Rinku strikes at 302.63 in the 20th over, having scored 115 runs off 38 balls. Only Nepal’s Dipendra Singh Airee (347.16) has a higher strike rate.

28 Wickets for Arshdeep Singh in in his first over while opening the bowling (first two overs) – the most in men’s T20Is. Junaid Siddique and Shaheen Shah Afridi have 27 apiece.

Striking with new ball

Most wickets taken across the first two overs of the innings in men’s t20is

13.57 Economy rate of New Zealand’s spinners in Nagpur, where they conceded 95 runs in seven overs. It is the first instance of New Zealand’s spinners conceding an economy of 12 or more in a men’s T20I where they bowled six or more overs.

BMC Election Results 2026 Live Updates:

 The Maharashtra civic body poll results are showing a favourable trend for the Bharatiya Janata Party-Shiv Sena alliance, according to early trends as votes are being counted for elections to 29 civic bodies. The BJP is leading in 1171 wards, while its ally, the Shiv Sena, is ahead in 300 wards, according to early trends at 3:20 pm.

The spotlight is on Mumbai, where the Thackeray brothers have reunited to reclaim their heritage and are standing against the BJP-Shiv Sena alliance. The BJP-led alliance is ahead in 116 wards in the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), according to early leads. The Thackeray brothers, together, are ahead in 81 wards.

Jan 16, 2026

PCMC Election Results 2026: BJP Secures Massive Lead

The Pimpri-Chinchwad municipal corporation, considered as one of the richest after the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), had been held by Sharad Pawar’s undivided NCP since 2017. However, the Pawars have lost this stronghold, despite their aggressive campaigning.

The NCP (Ajit Pawar) is leading in 33 wards, while the NCP (Sharad Pawar) is leading in just one ward. BJP, on the other hand, is leading in 86 wards.

Jan 16, 2026

Maharashtra Civic Body Election Results: Celebrations Across Mumbai To Mark BJP-Shiv Sena Alliance Lead

Celebrations colour the streets of Mumbai as BJP-Shiv Sena alliance lead across seats in Maharashtra civic body polls.

Celebrations colour the streets of Mumbai as BJP-Shiv Sena alliance lead across seats in Maharashtra civic body polls

Controversy in the Valley: Understanding the New Mosque Data Drive

In the sensitive region of Jammu and Kashmir, a new administrative exercise has triggered a fresh wave of political and religious debate. Reports recently surfaced indicating that law enforcement agencies have initiated a comprehensive profiling drive regarding religious institutions in the Valley. As police seek granular details of Kashmir’s mosques local leaders, religious bodies, and politicians are voicing strong objections, terming the move as an “invasive” tactic that targets a specific community.

This article breaks down what information is being sought, why it is controversial, and what the reactions have been from prominent figures in the region.Physical Structure: Details on the construction, size, and layout of the mosques.

Financials: The cost of construction, sources of funding, monthly income, and expenditure.

Personal Data: Perhaps most controversially, the drive seeks detailed profiles of the imams (preachers) and management committees. This includes their financial status, bank account numbers, passport details, and even credit card information.What Data is Being Collected?

The scope of this new profiling exercise is reportedly unprecedented in its depth. As police seek granular details of Kashmir’s mosques the inquiry goes far beyond simple location tagging. According to recent reports, the police are gathering specific data points regarding the physical and financial health of these institutions.

The authorities are reportedly asking for:

• Physical Structure: Details on the construction, size, and layout of the mosques.
• Financials: The cost of construction, sources of funding, monthly income, and expenditure.
• Personal Data: Perhaps most controversially, the drive seeks detailed profiles of the imams (preachers) and management committees. This includes their financial status, bank account numbers, passport details, and even credit card information.

The thoroughness of this data collection has raised eyebrows, with critics wondering why such personal financial data is necessary for security purposes.

Criticism from Religious and Political Leaders

The reaction to this development has been swift and sharp. As police seek granular details of Kashmir’s mosques the Muttahida Majlis Ulama (MMU), led by Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, has publicly condemned the action. They have described the initiative as an “invasive data collection exercise” that sends a disturbing message to the Muslim residents of the state.

However, the criticism isn’t limited to religious clergy. Mainstream political leaders have also stepped into the fray. Aga Ruhullah Mehdi, a National Conference leader and Member of Parliament, has been particularly vocal. He argues that this is not merely a data drive but an attempt by the “right-wing ideology running the system” to gain control over religious pulpits.

Fears of Surveillance and “Controlled Sermons”

A major concern echoing through the Valley is the potential for intimidation. As police seek granular details of Kashmir’s mosques there is a fear that the data could be used to put preachers under constant surveillance.

Aga Ruhullah Mehdi expressed concerns that this surveillance is a precursor to controlling the narrative within religious spaces. He suggested that by collecting such minute details, the state is adding “extra layers of surveillance” to intimidate preachers. His apprehension is that eventually, sermons might be dictated by the state, with preachers forced to align their Friday addresses with the political agenda of the ruling party or the RSS.

The Question of Constitutional Rights

At the heart of this debate is the issue of religious freedom guaranteed by the Constitution of India. Critics argue that the state should not interfere in the management of religious institutions unless there is a specific, actionable security threat.

As police seek granular details of Kashmir’s mosques legal and political observers are asking why this level of scrutiny is being applied. Ruhullah questioned the necessity of the move, noting that security agencies likely already possess the relevant information needed for maintaining law and order. He termed the new drive an infringement on the freedom to practice religion, suggesting it targets a specific faith.

Security Context vs. Civil Liberties

While the police have not released a detailed official statement justifying the specific need for ATM and credit card details of mosque managers, such moves in the past have often been attributed to counter-terrorism efforts and tracking “terror financing.” However, the lack of transparency combined with the depth of the data demanded has tipped the scale of public opinion toward suspicion.

As police seek granular details of Kashmir’s mosques the debate between national security requirements and the civil liberties of local residents continues to widen. For now, the exercise is seen by many in Kashmir not as a standard administrative procedure, but as a project of ideological control.

Conclusion:

The situation in Jammu and Kashmir remains complex. As police seek granular details of Kashmir’s mosques the trust deficit between the administration and the local population appears to be deepening. Whether this data drive will lead to actual security benefits or merely serve to alienate the community further remains to be seen.Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What specific information are the police asking for regarding Kashmir’s mosques?
The police are reportedly asking for details on the mosque’s physical structure, source of funding, monthly income/expenses, and personal details of the management and preachers, including passports, bank accounts, and credit card info.

2. Who has criticized this move?
The move has been criticized by the Muttahida Majlis Ulama (MMU) led by Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, and National Conference MP Aga Ruhullah Mehdi, among others.

3. Why are politicians calling this “ideological”?
Critics like Aga Ruhullah Mehdi believe that the drive is motivated by a right-wing ideology aiming to control the religious narrative and “pulpit” of the mosques, rather than just ensuring security.

4. Is this data collection considered a violation of rights?
Critics argue that it infringes on the Constitutional right to freedom of religion and acts as an intimidation tactic through excessive surveillance.

5. What is the official reason for this data collection?
While critics call it harassment, such exercises are typically framed by authorities as measures to check the misuse of funds and prevent anti-national activities, though the specific demand for personal banking details has caused particular alarm.