Introduction:
House to Vote on Trump’s $9 Billion Spending Cuts for Foreign Aid and Public Broadcasting
Senate Narrowly Approves Major Budget Reductions
In a closely watched decision, the U.S. Senate has approved a $9 billion rollback in federal spending, targeting foreign aid and public broadcasting funds. The 51-48 vote, which saw two Republican senators break ranks, paves the way for the House of Representatives to give final approval later this week. If passed, the bill will head to President Trump for his signature.
Table of Contents
Foreign Aid and Public Broadcasting Face Deep Cuts
The majority of the proposed cuts—about $8 billion—are aimed at foreign assistance programs, while $1.1 billion would be slashed from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supports NPR and PBS. The move has sparked debate within the Republican Party, with Senators Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska voting against the measure.
Congressional Power of the Purse at Center of Debate
This vote has reignited a longstanding debate over Congress’s constitutional authority to control federal spending. Since the start of Trump’s second term, the White House has pushed to expand executive control over the budget, often through the Department of Government Efficiency. This latest rescissions bill, a rarely used tool, marks the first successful attempt to claw back funds since 1999.
GOP Leaders Call for Fiscal Responsibility
Republican leaders have framed the vote as a step toward reducing what they see as unnecessary government spending. Senate Majority Leader John Thune praised the administration’s efforts to identify and eliminate waste, calling the cuts “an important step toward fiscal sanity.”
Concerns Over Impact and Lack of Transparency
Despite the bill’s passage, some senators expressed concern about the lack of detail regarding which specific programs would be affected. Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina warned that if essential programs are cut, there could be consequences for the administration.
Education and Global Health Programs Spared
To secure enough votes, GOP leaders agreed to remove a $400 million cut to the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) and protect funding for key initiatives, including aid to Jordan and Egypt, Food for Peace, and certain global health programs.
By Catie Edmondson
Reporting from the Capitol
Local Public Broadcasting Stations at Risk
While NPR and PBS receive only a small portion of their funding from the federal government, many local stations rely heavily on support from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. The proposed cuts could force some stations to reduce programming or even shut down, especially in rural areas.
Democrats Warn of Long-Term Consequences
Democratic senators have criticized the move, arguing that it undermines bipartisan cooperation and Congress’s constitutional role. Senator Patty Murray of Washington cautioned that the cuts could jeopardize future negotiations on government funding and weaken public services.
What Happens Next
The House is expected to vote on the bill soon. If approved, the legislation will be sent to President Trump, who is likely to sign it into law. The outcome will have significant implications for U.S. foreign policy, public media, and the balance of power between Congress and the White House.
—
Q1: What does Trump’s $9 billion spending cut proposal include?
The proposal targets $8 billion in foreign aid and $1.1 billion in funding for public broadcasting, including NPR and PBS.
Q2: Why are these cuts controversial?
Critics argue the cuts undermine U.S. global influence and local public media, while supporters say they reduce wasteful government spending.
Q3: How will the House vote impact public broadcasting stations?
Many local stations rely heavily on federal funding and may face reduced programming or closures if the cuts are approved.
